back on cheddar news everyone last month,
Tesla founder Elon musk made a $44 billion
deal to buy the social media platform twitter
and take the company private.
Now musk is offering a slew of potential changes that he plans to implement,
like taking on twitter's algorithm to address spam bots.
However, the one thing top of mind when it comes to the deal is privacy concerns.
So lay it all out in an article for wired
is senior writer lily Hay Newman who joins us now.
Great to have you here. Thanks so much for joining us.
So why is privacy one of the top concerns here?
I think the big point here is that when there's any type
of regime change or sort of takeover of a service like this,
things can change about how the company or
how the organization is handling user privacy,
user security and that transition is not in users control and you know,
can be for better or for worse,
but is just something that can always happen with a private platform.
Alright, so Elon musk has said he wants to take on and defeat the bots here.
He's also talked about authenticating all humans on twitter.
Could this be one thing that maybe helps from a privacy standpoint getting
rid of these bots and only having real people on the platform?
Yeah, it's a complicated issue.
Certainly the idea of reducing or eliminating, you know,
spamming bots on twitter that could potentially reduce scams, you know,
could reduce all sorts of problematic and abusive behavior on twitter,
that would be a positive thing,
but it depends how you go about quote unquote authenticating all humans.
You know,
if that involves uh folks having to identify and
authenticate themselves to twitter using like you know I.
D. S. You know government issued I. D. S. Real name policies, something like that.
That can actually be very harmful to use your privacy and chilling to speech.
Whereas something like just doing a the equivalent of like a capture
or one of those things that proves that you are a human
that can be really helpful but that proving that you're a human
of some kind is different than proving who which human you are,
who specifically you are.
There's also been some some running concerns and theories out there about
what Elon musk would do with our direct messages per se.
There has been some who believe,
you know,
he could potentially have access to those direct
messages and give them to government agencies,
there's others who say look he might update it and make it encrypted.
Like we see with other messaging services as well what sort of
sort of view on how Elon musk will handle our R.
D. M. S here.
Right?
So I think my understanding is that because of some regulation that's in effect,
he likely wouldn't be able to sort of personally
view all messages but certainly conceptually that is,
you know hypothetically a concern with any takeover like this.
And I think you raised the most important point,
which is how would a new regime at twitter handle government requests, you know,
requests for information about users and you know,
would they attempt to stand up for users and you know,
not just hand everything over at the first question,
would they attempt to withhold you know, when they legally can
and to the question about encryption,
write something that twitter DmS in particular has has
not had is end to end encryption or an encrypted
protection where only the two people you know,
taking part in the conversation can view the messages and the company can't,
that's a protection Twitter DmS do not currently have and
haven't had but musk has said he supports it and
wants to implement end to end encryption for twitter DM
So that would be a great protection if it happened,
but
who knows if it will.
The famous biographer,
walter IsaAcson announced that he's doing a biography
on Elon musk and he was asked over the
weekend by the new york times what his
take is on Elon musk's fascination with twitter.
And walter.
IsaAcson told the new york times quote,
Ellen has always been fascinated by twitter and he deeply understands how
it can be used And maybe how it can be improved.
His fascination with Twitter does not surprise me.
I think this leads to the $44 billion Twitter look like under Elon Musk?
Well, I really couldn't begin to tell you,
but I agree with the point that the fascination is clearly there,
the desire to get the capital together to do this take over.
Uh you know clearly this money could have been spent in countless other ways as well.
So
there's a you know drive and a focus for him on twitter and it's going to be,
it'll it'll be a journey, it'll be a roller coaster for all of us.
Um there has also been some skeptics out
there obviously who have been concerned about misinformation,
disinformation given the fact that Elon musk has been
so ardent about free speech concerns on twitter,
what does the platform sort of look like when it comes to that?
There have there was a piece in the atlantic about a week or so ago that basically said
maybe it goes back to the twitter of 2016
when former president trump was on the platform,
you had misinformation and harassment ramping running rampant on the platform.
Is that sort of maybe the way that it's going to be?
Yes, very possible.
And I think that ties back to what we were discussing a minute
ago about why the question of authenticate all humans and what that means
is so important because if users are being asked to provide documentation of
their specific personal identity and if twitter
holds all of that information and if
no one can speak anonymously or pseudonymously on the platform that really
impacts people's ability to speak on the platform at all and,
you know, not just in the U.
S. But globally.
That can be very chilling to speech if everything someone says is, you know,
tied to their specific personal identity and in many ways reduces
people's ability in many sort of repressive context to speak freely
wired Senior writer lily Hay Newman, Great to have you on here.
Thank you so very much for joining us.